The article “Left Behind, Way Behind” is a believable argument. First of all, the author of the article is
Bob Herbert. He is a columnist for The New York Times that writes on issues
such as politics, urban issues, and social trends. He is a credible source of the information because
he has knowledge about the countries educational issues. The author’s tone towards the article is
negative towards the educational issue.
He uses strategies during his writing.
He starts off his paper by saying “First the bad news.” He wants his audience (parents and school
goers) to believe that this is the only bad part about our educational system,
but the very next paragraph he hits the audience with “Now the worse news.” The author states his point of view about the
problem at the beginning of the paper and uses facts and statistics to back up
those views. The claims that the author
is using is claims of fact. He uses
examples and statistics in the examples to show America’s educational system at
its finest. The percentages show that
the school faculties are not doing their jobs of teaching young children and
making them successful in life. Another
strategy that he uses is a comparison.
He compares snoop dogg and Paris Hilton as children’s role models. He shows his audience the startling facts of
the affect others have on children. His
strategy is to convince his audience the importance of school for children. The author ends his article with ways to help
the problem. This type of support gives
great evidence towards the thesis that the problem can be reversed with simple
steps.
You've done a solid job of identifying the claims (and strategies) the author is using. Now, take this a step further and think about what each DOES to the reader of the article... also paragraphs might help you separate each thought. :)
ReplyDelete